You might be wondering what I’m thinking writing politics, for indeed, I am not one to write about politics. Let us go back to the first post on this blog, Imperfect Reality. When I wrote that post, I was not sure what to expect. Sure I was criticised by some circles, and I appreciate that criticism, most of it only went to proving my conflicts with perfection. But what I had not foreseen was the reactions to what some called a bold confrontation to the status quo. And one theme seemed to run through most of our reactions to perfection: we suffer from a disease just as bad as perfection – a dependency syndrome.
We’ve heard the ‘dependency syndrome’ song over and over in different contexts, but I’m not writing today about economic or political dependence. Let us focus on an innate social and moral dependence that so deeply plagues most of us, shaping who we become, guiding how we live, how we act, and many times, stifling who we could be.
From childhood, we learn to depend on those around us, not just for what to eat and wear, but for communication, for happiness, for faith and hope, for love, for acceptance. And that kills us as we grow. I know by writing this I might be attempting to dance ekizino on quick sand, but think about it for slightly more than a brief moment.
The human being is, as has been variously described, a social being. And this holds even more for African communities, which instead of “cogito ergo sum”, subscribe to, practice and enforce “we are, therefore, I am”. In my opinion, this community affected way of living (allow me) is a reversal of the proper order of human life and social dynamics. If I may deconstruct a community to its smallest component, I will be left with the human being. Now, everyone is expected to play his role in the community, sort of do his part to keep the sun shining, right? However, community tends to dictate the role and expect each individual to behave, live, and contribute in a particular way. Does this not limit ones abilities?
My 300 year old grandmother would be, if you will indulge me, a good representation of authentic African values, at least in this day and age. She is old enough to have been here when the missionaries came, so she knows her stuff. According to her, a left handed person is not complete, is errant, and must be corrected as soon as he or she begins to exhibit levorotatory tendencies. Pause for a minute, if you’re right handed, and imagine having been forced by society to be left handed. Laughable? Maybe. Even contemptible when, for example, issues of calling and career are controlled by community expectations.
And yet daily, we depend on our communities for decisions that affect us as individuals. We feel so required and compelled to fulfil community expectations of our lives that we forget to live our lives. We may have abilities to excel in one thing, and even prosper doing it, but because our community considers another more honourable, we do it; put all our energies in it, and please the community, even if we are productive to less than half of our capacity. We choose lifestyles that conform to what the community expects of us, even when we are not cut out for them. In the end, we have a smiling community of unhappy people, akin to a house made of unbaked bricks, and unsheltered from the vagaries nature imposes!
I recently had privity to an interesting discussion on happiness, and while that is the subject of another post in the works, I will borrow from that a snippet on happiness. It has been said in jest how an infant has two principle worries: an empty bottle and a full diaper. Take care of these and it will be happy. Basic explanation? The child does not have that much of a reference point for its happiness. If only we could build on this, and foster the happiness of the fundamental units of our commUNITies, then we would be on the path to stronger, independent societies, for indeed, each individual would seek to do best what he does best, not what the community suggests he does best.
Do not rush to accuse me of preaching egotistic isolationism, for though indeed I suggest a focus on the individual (a concept the west has been criticised for), I hold that a chain is as strong as its weakest link. Woe unto us if all the links are weak. Is dependence on the external a good idea for internal equilibrium? You tell me, the answers after all, are supposed to come from outside. I am African like that!

